Data modelling and research simulation
Reproducible systems for prediction, classification, factor research, strategy testing, and model comparison.
Keep data versions, experiment parameters, cost assumptions, and risk exposure together so results can be reproduced and challenged.
Where daily work and management decisions become harder.
Backtests omit cost, liquidity, or data bias
Several model and factor versions must be compared
A research process needs to become a team product
Built for work that
standard software misses.
We start with one high-value workflow, make its scope and operating risks explicit, and expand only after the first version is proven in use.
Experiments are scattered across scripts and sheets
Backtests omit cost, liquidity, or data bias
Several model and factor versions must be compared
A research process needs to become a team product
How work moves
through the system.
Roles, permissions, review points, and exception rules are adapted to the customer’s current operating model.
Record the sample, fields, cleaning steps, and information available at the time.
Create candidate signals and test missingness, bias, and stability.
Use time-based splits and out-of-sample data for evaluation.
Include fees, slippage, capacity, trading halts, and risk limits.
Inspect returns, drawdown, exposure, and the sources of variation.
Save data, code, parameters, outcomes, and the next falsifiable check.
Data, parameters, constraints, and outcomes stay reproducible
Select a stage to inspect the operating rhythm that distinguishes this class of system.
Inspect the controls,
states, and outputs.
These interfaces come from real business workflows. Public screens remove customer-sensitive data while preserving the operating structure.
Choose the modules
the workflow requires.
Modules can be delivered independently or connected to existing software after discovery confirms the data and permission boundaries.
Technology follows
the operating requirement.
Data volume, latency, security, and current systems determine the final architecture.
Reproducible experiment tracking
Record data, code, parameters, environment, and outcomes for team review.
Out-of-sample robustness
Use time splits, stress scenarios, and sensitivity tests to reduce overfitting.
Realistic operating constraints
Represent fees, slippage, capacity, halts, and risk exposure in simulation.
Scope and operating
conditions stay explicit.
- Public screens remove strategy, performance, and commercially sensitive information.
- Historical testing does not predict future performance and no return is promised.
- Data licensing, model use, and production execution require separate authorisation.
Agree the scope, integration needs and ongoing support.
Agree development, deployment, training, maintenance and customer involvement, with cost and acceptance documented for the project.
Delivery scope
- Data and experiment pipeline
- Research and backtest workspace
- Metrics, risk, and attribution
- Testing and deployment documentation
Existing systems and information
- Market and alternative data
- Python / notebooks / warehouse
- Model training platforms
- Schedulers and compute
- BI and reporting
- Permissions, audit, and version control
Start with the work that most needs to improve.
Tell us how the work happens today, where time is lost, which systems you use and what needs to improve. We can then discuss scope, implementation and collaboration.
Discuss your business needs ↗
